1. The Defendants jointly and severally pay KRW 195,205,241 to the Plaintiff.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the Defendants.

3...

1. According to the evidence evidence Nos. 1 through 7 of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, the non-party Seoul Savings Bank acquired the claims against the Defendants of the Jeonju Savings Bank on September 5, 201, the interest rate of loans is 495,00,000 won, 7.9% per annum, 17.9% per annum, 17.9% per annum, 19.9% per annum, and 19.9% per annum, and the date of repayment on February 20, 2014, and lent the above amount to the Defendant A. The Defendant B entered into a joint and several surety contract with the Defendant for the above loans. The Plaintiff acquired the claims against the Defendants of the Jeonju Savings Bank on September 5, 201 in accordance with the Financial Services Commission’s decision to transfer the repayment agreement with the Financial Services Commission, and the Defendant A lost the interest rate of loans due to the failure to perform the above loan repayment agreement, and the Plaintiff was able to cover the interest rate of the loans at least 184.15%

Therefore, the defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the above KRW 195,205,241 to the plaintiff.

As to this, the defendants sold the above real estate and repaid the loan, but the plaintiff's employee failed to sell it.

or to claim that the current loan has no ability to repay.

However, there is no evidence to acknowledge the facts as alleged by the Defendants, and merely because there is no ability to repay, the above loan obligations owed by the Defendants against the Plaintiff cannot be discharged. Therefore, the Defendants’ assertion is without merit.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all.