logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.04.03 2012고정3397
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 10, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 04:00 on February 10, 2012, when the Defendant was operating a Bchip truck at the Ulsan-si branch located in the Tchip, the Defendant was unable to repair the vehicle due to the failure to handle the accident and receive insurance due to minor damage of dump trucks; and (b) the Defendant’s chip vehicle was considerably damaged, but it was impossible to repair the vehicle due to the lack of self-insurance.

The Defendant and C had received the report of the accident that the D New Franf vehicle operated by C was involved in a traffic accident leading to the Defendant’s vehicle and attempted to defraud the insurance money.

On February 13, 2012, around 13:00, the Defendant and C confirmed the damaged part of the vehicle of the accident in front of the F Office located in Gyeonggi-si, and phone call to the Mezz and Fire Customer Center, thereby causing a traffic accident leading to the previous Defendant’s vehicle while changing the vehicle, and the Defendant also made a false statement that the insurance company’s on-site investigation is likely to cause a drilling accident.

As a result, the defendant deceivings the victim Mzz fire insurance company, and received a total of KRW 17,694,030,030, such as 14,580,000, 1,30, 1,300, 284,330, 1,530, 284,330, and 1,530,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Each police statement concerning C and G;

1. Recording records;

1. Photographs of an accident vehicle;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to receive and details of automobile accidents, and details of payment of insurance proceeds of merz fire;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow