Seoul High Court-2015-Nu-49346 ( December 22, 2015)

Other-2014-008 (Law No. 26, 2014)

(Trial without Continuation) It is not subject to the payment of a reward for tax evasion because it is not an important material.

(Summary) The gist of the original judgment) The information on the tax evasion by the person who reported the tax evasion by the reporting person, but did not provide important information on such information, and thus, the tax evasion report was not subject to the reporting on the tax evasion report (it cannot be deemed that the tax assessment was made only on such grounds, even if the investigation was conducted based on the petition by the reporting person on the tax evasion report).

2016Du30927 Revocation of revocation of disposition to refuse to pay compensation for tax evasion

Park AA

BB Director of Regional Tax Office

April 15, 2016

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Examining the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal, since it is apparent that the appeal falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Trial Procedure, and it is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.