A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving of a motor vehicle B New Zealand XD.

At around 19:50 on January 9, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car and continued two lanes of the four lanes in front of the feed factory in 1034 as the Pyeongtaek-si games at Pyeongtaek-si. The Defendant driven the said car at an irregular speed from the gate to the shot seat.

At the time, since the signal at night is an intersection where it is installed, a person engaged in the driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to reduce the speed and to safely drive the signal in accordance with the signals such as signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant’s occupational negligence, when the signal, etc. of the front side was driven by the left-hand turn signal from the opposite side of the Defendant’s moving direction due to the occupational negligence, disregarding that the signal, etc. of the front side is a red signal, received the front-hand part of the Defendant’s driving of the victim C(the age of 47) driving with the front-hand part of the Defendant’s driving.

After all, the Defendant suffered, by the above occupational negligence, the salt ties and tensions, etc. of the trend that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the above C, and the Defendant suffered from the victim E (V, 46 years of age) who was accompanied by the above Bosch Rexton car, about two weeks of medical treatment.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, at around 19:50 on January 9, 2015, the Defendant operated the said new-burt XD car, which was not covered by mandatory insurance on the front side of the 1034 Fururriian manufacturing plant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Mandatory insurance policies;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. The injury resulting from occupational negligence under Article 3(1), Article 2(1)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;