본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
대전지방법원 홍성지원 2020.04.28 2020고단2

근로자퇴직급여보장법위반

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged is that the defendant, as the representative of C in Seocheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, is working as a dump officer from May 27, 2017 to May 10, 2019 at the site of D D D Corporation in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun.

Retired E’s retirement allowances of KRW 5,340,98, and route articles from November 16, 2016 to May 10, 2019.

The retired F's retirement pay of 8,785,285 won was not paid within 14 days from the date of retirement without any agreement between the parties on the extension of the due date.

Judgment

Article 44 subparagraph 1 of Article 44, Article 9, and Article 44 subparagraph 2 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act: Judgment dismissing prosecution as a result of a prosecution under the proviso to Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.