The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On August 31, 2019, the Defendant: (a) 19:15 on August 31, 2019, while she had a verbal dispute with his wife in front of the C Hospital located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant believed that the victim D (the age of 54) cited a mobile phone in his mobile phone was aware that he was aware of the fact that the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant was challenged; and (b) the victim’s wife, security guards, the passing person, and the route-to-face customer, etc. were able to keep the victim.

Omission, fluor, fluor of a bitch, fluor of a bitch, fluor of a bitch, knife, fluor of a bitch.

In other words, the victim was openly insultingd by 15 minutes of a large sound.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 311 of the Criminal Act;

(b) An offense subject to prosecution upon complaint: Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act.

C. On October 31, 2019, prior to prosecution (round October 31, 2019, around 20:00), a letter of revocation of a victim’s complaint was submitted on October 31, 2019.

(d) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 2 of the Criminal Procedure Act;