Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On November 21, 2016, around 04:30 on November 21, 2016, the Defendant was requested by F, a policeman belonging to the Busan Police Station E District of the Busan Police Station, who was dispatched to pay taxi expenses without paying the taxi expenses after getting on the juice C taxi in front of the department store "Tsi" and moving from B to Ddo road in Busan Gun on the same day at around 05:00 on the same day, and was doing so without paying the taxi expenses. In addition, the Defendant abused F, who was dispatched upon receipt of a report from F, a policeman at the Busan Police Station E District of the Busan Police Station, to pay the taxi expenses.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are as follows, and the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances leading the Defendant to the instant crime, means and results thereof, and other various sentencing conditions specified in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the circumstances before and after the instant crime, shall be determined as ordered by taking account of the following circumstances, as well as the age, sex, environment, circumstances leading the Defendant to the instant crime.

There is no need to strictly punish the defendant in a manner that is extremely poor in the nature of the crime of this case, which has actively had physical power to police officers, and that is, in the light of the light of public authority, to seriously punish the defendant.

The defendant recognized the crime of this case.

There is no history of criminal punishment against the defendant.

The defendant needs to be given a good social opportunity as a young person who is still over 22 years of age.