Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
Seized evidence 1 to 8 shall be confiscated.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant operated a game room in the name of “C Gameland” on the 3rd floor of Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu.
1. The Defendant, from October 19, 2014 to December 22, 2014, installed 13 compact 10 game products, which were not classified in the said “C Gameland”, and provided them to unspecified customers for use.
2. The Defendant exchanged 10,00 won in cash and 20,000 won in cash at 2,000 won in a fixed term of office, and 40,000 won in the sea, to unspecified customers according to the points obtained through the above use of the game product at the above time.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Written statements of D;
1. Police seizure records;
1. Application of statutes on site photographs;
1. Relevant Article on criminal facts, Article 44 (1) 2, Article 32 (1) 1 ( point of using and providing game products classified as non-grade game products), Article 44 (1) 2, and Article 32 (1) 7 ( point of exchanging game products) of the Game Industry Promotion Act, and each choice of imprisonment with labor;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. The fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 44(2) of the Confiscation Industry Promotion Act is against the defendant when the defendant committed a crime is committed is the factor for sentencing favorable to the defendant.
The Defendant’s crime of this case is a factor for sentencing unfavorable to the Defendant, which is disadvantageous to the Defendant, because the risk of leaving economic distress in light of the risk is extremely high by continuously taking advantage of the user’s speculative spirit to cause property loss. The fact that the crime of this case was committed at the point of time within one year after the period of the suspension of execution of the same kind of case was passed, including once the period of the suspension of execution.
The order is issued in consideration of various sentencing conditions, such as the scale of operation of the game room, the age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after crimes.