A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 31, 2012, the Defendant violated the Game Industry Promotion Act due to the provision of a classified game machine, the Defendant set up 15 game machine in the original city B and the third floor from around January 7, 2013 to operate the game room, and let many unspecified customers, such as C, who found the place of the game room, run the game using the said game machine.

As a result, the defendant provided game products not classified by the Game Rating Board to the public for use.

2. The Defendant violated the Game Industry Promotion Act due to the exchange of game products in cash, converting the points left in the game season to the customers whose game was finished at a time and time, such as paragraph (1), into one won per point.

As a result, the defendant exchanged the result obtained through the use of game products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts and Articles 44 (1) 2, 32 (1) 1 (the point of providing the game products classified as non-grade game products, the choice of imprisonment), 44 (1) 2, and 32 (1) 7 (the point of exchanging game products and the choice of imprisonment) of the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (The grounds that the defendant reflects the wrongness, and the running period, etc. of the game of this case);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 44 (2) of the Confiscation Industry Promotion Act, Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;