1. On April 24, 2014, Defendant B, and C respectively, and Defendant D, E, and F respectively, KRW 200,000 and each of the said money.

1. The facts following the facts of recognition do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the overall purport of the pleadings in each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 9, Gap evidence No. 14, and No. 15 (including each number).

The Plaintiff’s interview with the media and case No. 1) The Plaintiff took a television interview using the general program channel “J” and relay vehicle, and made a statement to the effect that the government prevents the work of the Plaintiff. Such a statement was reported through the “J”. 2) A was indicted for defamation, etc. by publication, but both the first instance court (Seoul District Court Decision 2014Ra612, Jan. 9, 2015) and the appellate court (Seoul District Court Decision 2015No200, Sept. 1, 2016) were acquitted.

나. 피고들의 행위 1) 피고 B 가) 인터넷 포털 다음(DAUM)의 카페 “K”의 “웃긴글은올리지마셈♡사랑이 넘치는 쩌리겟판◇”이라는 게시판(이하 ‘이 사건 게시판’이라고 한다)에 G “[여시뉴스데스크]"'L”“이라는 제목의 기사 이하 '이 사건 제1 기사'라고 한다

A. On the same day, Defendant B written the comments on the article No. 1 of this case, “The year which caused the locked”.

B. Also, “The same day on the bulletin board of the instant case” as the article No. 2 of the title “N” in the article No. 1336, May 1, 200

가 게시되자, 피고 B은 같은 날 "욕하기도 아까운년. 아까 믿었던 내기 미쳤다 ㅋ

I have drawn up comments on “Isia Isia Isia Isia”.

2 Defendant C written the comments on the article 1 of G, “I am hypted with the value of the crime, I am hypted, I am hypted with the value of the crime.”

B. The defendant C also on the bulletin board of this day.