Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On October 12, 2018, around 04:00, the Defendant took a white ecopic in the city of Busan at around 04:00, the Defendant got off the victim E (the 59-year old), who was passing the place, to take the victim’s head and failed to resist the victim E (the 59-year old-old). At the time of galloning the victim’s head, the Defendant took a ecopic in a white ecopic in which the market price is equivalent to KRW 600,000,000,000,000,000 won.

Accordingly, the defendant took the victim's property by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of statutes governing field photographs, damaged objects photographs, CCTV photographs, and video CDs;

1. Article 333 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following grounds for sentencing has been repeated for a favorable reason):

1. Scope of applicable sentences under law: Imprisonment with labor for a period of one year and six months from one year to fifteen years;

2. The scope of recommended punishment on the sentencing criteria [the types of decisions] the scope of punishment [the scope of recommended punishment] of Type 1 (general robbery) [the person subject to special sentencing] (the area of recommendation and the scope of recommended punishment], the area of mitigation of punishment, one year and six months to three years of imprisonment.

3. Determination of sentence: Imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months, and the crime of this case for a year of suspended execution for a period of three years is that the defendant, at the main point, frightened the head of the victim, who was a female employee, who frightening alcohol in the state of drinking at his/her bar, frightened the head of the victim, who was a female employee, and escaped from the bank, and frightened the bank, and the degree of violence is not weak, and if the victim, who was in the state of infrightening at the time, frightened, and frightened, the defendant's liability for

However, the defendant appears to have the attitude of recognizing and opposing the crime, and the victim was forced to return the strong room on the day of the case, and additionally received one million won, and then does not want the punishment of the defendant by agreement with the defendant.