beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant Republic of Korea is the Macheon District Court's Macheon Registry with respect to the land listed in attached Form 1.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
(a) For the Land Survey Division of Macheon-gun, F is written as the owner of G and H land;
B. On December 20, 1962, I died on the part of the Plaintiff, and succeeded to the children of J and I who died earlier than I. The Plaintiff inherited his share on May 30, 1984.
C. Defendant Republic of Korea completed the registration of initial ownership of each land listed in the separate sheet No. 1, and L purchased the land listed in the separate sheet No. 2 from Defendant Republic of Korea on August 29, 201 from Defendant Republic of Korea on September 2, 2011, and completed the registration of ownership transfer pursuant to Article 33843 of the receipt of Macheon District Court’s receipt of Macheon District Court’s receipt.
L died on January 24, 2013, and Defendant B, the husband of L, succeeded jointly to three-seven shares, Defendant C and D, the husband of L, according to two-seven shares, respectively.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 to 7 evidence, purport of the whole pleadings
2. The F recorded as the owner of each land in the separate sheet of determination shall be presumed to have become final and conclusive upon receipt of the assessment as the owner of each land listed in the separate sheet of determination, unless there is any counter-proof that the assessment has been changed by the ruling.
In addition, as long as the registration of ownership preservation in the name of Defendant Republic of Korea, which completed each land listed in the separate sheet, is revealed to have a separate title holder as above, the presumption becomes null and void, and as such, F shall be deemed to have acquired each land listed in the separate sheet.
On the other hand, according to the following facts, the evidence mentioned above and the fact-finding results of this court's fact-finding, I can be seen as the same person under the name of the situation, F and the plaintiff I.
In other words, F, the circumstance-based F, and I, the Plaintiff, are equal to “M”, and the legal domicile of the Plaintiff, E-ri, where each land is located, I, as well as the Plaintiff, was written to Australia.