logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.09.26 2013고단3478
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year and a fine of 600,000 won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 16, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. in the Yeongdeungpo Branch of the Gwangju District Court on August 16, 2012.

Criminal facts

1. The point of violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act;

가. 피고인은 2013. 6. 3. 22:00경부터 같은 날 23:00경까지 광주 남구 C에 있는 광주남부경찰서 D파출소에서 파출소 소속 경위 E으로부터 무단횡단으로 통고처분을 받았다는 이유로 술에 취한 채로 E에게 “내가 뭘 잘못했느냐 잘 못한 것이 없으니 너희 경찰이 사과해라. 무릎 꿇고 사과하면 가겠다.”라고 큰소리를 쳐 소란을 피웠다.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, led to very rough words and actions by public offices.

B. On June 4, 2013, from around 01:00 to 03:00 on the same day, the Defendant was able to avoid disturbance by, under the influence of alcohol at the instant D police box, such as destroying the entrance.

Accordingly, the defendant, while drunk, was in a riotous and disorderly manner in a public office.

C. On June 4, 2013, from around 04:10 to 04:48 of the same day, the Defendant was able to avoid disturbance, such as: (a) under the influence of alcohol at the pertinent D police box stating that “if he/she died of a death, he/she shall die of a party; and (b) shaking the entrance of the location thereof, he/she was able to avoid disturbance.”

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, led to very rough words and actions by public offices.

2. Point of interference with business;

A. On June 12, 2013, at around 20:50 on June 12, 2013, the Defendant ordered the Victim G in Nam-gu, Gwangju, to 1stud boom and 1 disease in the H restaurant, without any meal from 21:30 on the same day to 22:20 on the same day, the Defendant saw a mixed fribly, and fried a television channel, and sees the victim’s “after the end of the business hours.” The Defendant saw the victim’s demand to “I would have not fright to drink.”

arrow