A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 00:20 on May 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) tried to verify the instant circumstances on the ground that the Defendant, a police officer belonging to the police station in the Seo-gu Police Station Cdistrict in Gwangju, Seo-gu, Gwangju, about 101 Dong 1501, and called to the scene after receiving a report on domestic violence from the front corridor at around 00:20 on May 7, 2017, the Defendant: (b) brought a car for young children located in the corridor in the corridor; and (c) the victim’s “path, pathy

While speaking, the victim’s face was expressed at one time by drinking home.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases, and at the same time, the Defendant laid down the bones requiring approximately three weeks medical treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of the police statements made to D, E, F, G, and H;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties, the choice of imprisonment), and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of harm and the choice of imprisonment);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes. Article 40 (Punishment on Punishment of Serious Bodily Injury);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In light of the fact that the reason for sentencing Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act (hereinafter “Social Service Order”) of the Defendant inflicted an injury upon the police officer with the bones of frighten, the responsibility for the crime is very heavy and is also not good.

However, there are extenuating circumstances such as the defendant's drinking with his family in his house, the fact that the defendant has caused the case in this case while drinking with his family at his house, the fact that the defendant is in depth against his will, the fact that he has agreed with the victimized police officer, and the fact that he has no

In full view of the above circumstances and the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances before and after the crime of this case, and the circumstances of all the sentencing indicated in the records, the defendant shall be sentenced to a judgment of a suspended execution wherein the community service order is added for a long time to the defendant.