(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.01.18 2017고합392

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.01.18 2017고합392

강간

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

The defendant shall order the defendant to complete a lecture for sexual assault treatment for 80 hours.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 5, 2017, around 17:37, the Defendant: (a) carried the victim F (V, 27 years old) who was undergoing education into the studio room at the “E”-type shop (hereinafter “E”) operated by the Defendant on the first floor underground of the D Building in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (b) carried the victim F (V, 27 years old) who was undergoing education into the studio; and (c) let the victim take the 30 minutes of education into the studio, and (d) carried the victim at the bed.

Since then, at around 18:07 on the same day, the Defendant suffered sprinks at the above place and caused the defective victim to go back to a single panty in the victim’s bucks and sprink sprink sprinks that are located on the sprink, and the victim sprinked to sprinks at the sprinks and sprinks.

In addition, while the defendant was kneeing the victim's tamp, kneeing kneeling with his knee, etc., which is feld up in the bed, the defendant was kneeing the victim's sound above a single panty, using the victim's thought that the victim was kneeing the face with the hole of the Malid, and was frightd from the defendant, and then the victim was kneing the part of the victim's sound above a single panty, chucking the one-time panty and kneing the finger into the victim's quality.

In this regard, the victim refers to the defendant "dy," and when the victim inserted the fingers into the part of the defendant's sound, the police is required to do so.

Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine

The prosecutor made a statement to the effect that “I would like to go back again,” but the prosecutor made a statement to the effect that “I would like to go out,” but this court made a statement to the effect that “I would like to go out,” “I would like to go out.” In full view of the overall purport of the victim’s statement and the situation at the time, the victim is different from the facts charged.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2017.06.23 2015고합274

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.05.17 2016고단3373

-청주지방법원 충주지원 2016.09.22 2016고합43

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.02.18 2015고합268

-서울동부지방법원 2019.10.17 2018고단4035