The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged of this case is as follows: A, an employee of the defendant, was 1.1 ton of the 4th ton of the B freight vehicle, even though he could not operate more than 10 ton of the 10 ton of the 10 ton of the 4th ton of the B freight vehicle, even though he could not operate the 18:56 on May 24, 1994 with respect to the Defendant’s work at the 4th ton of the 4th ton.

2. The prosecutor of the judgment applied Article 86, Article 84 subparagraph 1 and Article 54 (1) of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; hereinafter “former Road Act”) to the facts charged in the instant case, and the defendant was notified of the summary order subject to retrial and confirmed.

However, after the above summary order became final and conclusive, Article 86 of the former Road Act provides that "where an agent, employee, or other servant of a corporation commits an offence under Article 84 subparagraph 1 of the same Act in connection with the business of the corporation, the corporation shall also be fined in accordance with the Constitution." According to the above decision, the above provision of the same Act, which is the applicable provisions of the facts charged, has retroactively lost its effect.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.