logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2015.10.29 2015고단885
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in this case is that A, an employee of the defendant, loaded and operated a black tree in a state of 13.55 tons more than 10 tons out of the limit 10 tons on the road in front of the Geumcheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Seocheon-gun, Gangwon-do, Seoul, on April 29, 1994, around 15:06 with respect to the defendant's business.

2. The prosecutor of the judgment applied Article 86, Article 84 subparagraph 1 and Article 54 (1) of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; hereinafter “former Road Act”) to the facts charged in the instant case, and the defendant was notified of the summary order subject to retrial and confirmed.

However, after the above summary order became final and conclusive, Article 86 of the former Road Act provides that "where an agent, employee, or other servant of a corporation commits an offence under Article 84 subparagraph 1 of the same Act in connection with the business of the corporation, the corporation shall also be fined in accordance with the Constitution." According to the above decision, the above provision of the same Act, which is the applicable provisions of the facts charged, has retroactively lost its effect.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow