Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. F Co., Ltd. and Defendants 1) F Co., Ltd. (former Trade Name G Co., Ltd.) was changed on October 9, 2003.
hereinafter referred to as “F” only
On January 14, 1997, Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”) was established for the purpose of manufacturing and selling chemical products. 2) Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) was incorporated for the purpose of manufacturing and selling fertilizers and chemical products on December 31, 1954.
3) Defendant B served as F’s director from March 28, 2001 to March 31, 2007, from March 31, 2008 to April 15, 2009, and from April 15, 2009 to March 30, 2012, respectively, as F’s internal director. In addition, Defendant B was appointed as Defendant Company’s director on September 1, 200 and served as Defendant Company’s joint representative director from August 5, 2003 to December 21, 207, as Defendant D’s representative director from April 14, 199 to December 21, 207.
5) From December 21, 2007 to March 30, 2012, Defendant E served as a representative director of F, and was appointed as a liquidator of the said company on March 30, 2012. (b) Defendant E, from around 1989, went into a new business based on a loan, but the Defendant Company incurred excessive loans and financial costs by failure to produce products.
At the time, the Plaintiff, a major shareholder of the Defendant Company, and the representative director of the Defendant Company, was established on January 14, 1997 in order to resolve the financial problem of the Defendant Company. Around that time, only the machinery and equipment corresponding to the production sector of Harulua and the leading body owned by the Defendant Company (hereinafter “instant machinery and equipment”) was separated and transferred to F.
2) While the Plaintiff is in office as the representative director of the Defendant Company, he finally takes charge of F’s personnel, financial support, production management, etc., and operated F as a single business department of the Defendant Company. 3) The Defendant Company applied for the business improvement program on September 11, 1998, but the Defendant Company subsequently applied for the business improvement program, but the final default on March 18, 199.