logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.26 2016가단5287590
양수금
Text

1. Of the instant lawsuits, the claims Nos. 1, 2, 5, and 6 are dismissed, respectively.

2. The plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The allegations and judgment of the parties

A. The plaintiff's assertion is as shown in the ground for claim attached to the summary of the claim

(However, ‘creditor' is regarded as ‘Defendant'. (B) The creditor is regarded as ‘Defendant'.

Judgment

No. 1 and No. 2: Hyundai Capital Claim No. 3: there is no benefit of protection of rights (the judgment on the acquisition money case No. 2010da8286 and No. 2010 Ghana8279, May 26, 201, which became final and conclusive on June 11, 2011): New Card Claim No. 4, lack of evidence to prove that the new credit card company has a right to use credit cards as alleged by the defendant, as the defendant, and there is no benefit of protection of rights: the expiration of the extinctive prescription (the five-year extinctive prescription period from September 1, 2010, which was last received from the defendant), No. 5, six (foreign Exchange Bank) bank: there is no benefit of protection of rights (the judgment on the acquisition money case No. 2010da417679, Jun. 11, 2011 becomes final and conclusive on May 13, 2014).

2. According to the conclusion, each part of claims relating to claims Nos. 1, 2, 5, and 6 in the instant lawsuit is dismissed, and the part of claims relating to claims Nos. 3 and 4 is dismissed.

arrow