1. The portion of the claim in respect of the new card and Seosan Agricultural Co., Ltd. in the instant lawsuit shall be dismissed, respectively.

2. The defendant.

1. The allegations and judgment of the parties

(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;

(However, the "creditor" is deemed to be the "defendant" for the plaintiff and the "debtor". 【The grounds for recognition】 Each entry and the purport of the whole pleadings in the evidence Nos. 1 to 5

B. Judgment 1 on the Defendant’s defense of extinctive prescription: The new credit card No. 1 does not have a benefit of protection of rights because the period of extinctive prescription is excessive. The new credit card No. 2012Gaso5253 decided June 19, 2012 was rendered in favor of the Plaintiff. This decision became final and conclusive on July 17, 2012 (Evidence No. 5-1) No. 3: Busan District Court Decision 2010 tea21315 decided Oct. 14, 2010 and the payment order on the credit card use price case No. 205 decided Nov. 6, 2010 (Evidence No. 5-3) and the National Credit Card No. 2079 decided Oct. 27, 2010, which became final and conclusive on Oct. 14, 2010 (Evidence No. 5-2).