logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.05.26 2015노3972
뇌물공여
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. On February 25, 2013, the Defendant did not drink with H at AI entertainment stations located in Daejeon PH on February 25, 2013.

B. Legal reasoning is that the Defendant requested in relation to H’s duties is merely sent by e-mail such as “the reorganization of national land traffic department G (not)” and the remainder is related to the duties of others, and thus, a bribe offering crime is established not a bribe offering crime, but a bribe offering crime is established. However, it is not specified whether the Defendant provided a certain letter of claim for golf or meal contact cost.

Therefore, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine, thereby convicting the entire facts charged of a bribe offering.

(c)

The sentence of the court below's unfair sentencing (amounting to three million won) is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court acknowledged the following facts based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the lower court’s determination on the assertion of facts: (i) Around February 25, 2013, H provided the Defendant and Daejeon E card at the investigative agency, and subsequently, he provided the alcohol at the AI entertainment station; (ii) the same shall apply to the Defendant’s drinking at the investigation agency (the investigation record No. 992 pages); and (iii) the lower court stated in the court court that “I would like to have known of how I would go to, and would go to, AI, even though I would go to drink (the trial record No. 108 pages); (ii) around 23:43 on the same day, H was 160,00 won with the Defendant’s corporate card at the time of payment (the investigation record No. 885); and (iv) the mobile phone details at the time of the mobile phone call address at 208,000 H’s objective evidence at the time of settlement; and (iv) the Defendant’s objective credibility of the investigation record at 2.

어제 고마워~ ^^’ 라는 문자를 보내기도 한 점( 수사기록 제 888 쪽) 등에 비추어 보면, 피고인이 2013. 2. 25. 대전 유성구 AH에 있는 AI 유흥 주점에서 H 와...

arrow