logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.01.12 2016고단6028
강제추행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant is an employee of the private company Eul, who is entrusted with the new apartment construction business, and is in charge of the sale of apartment units and model house management from Chungcheong B apartment unit sales model house to the head of planning headquarters, and the victim D (the victim 22 years old) is an employee of the corporation E, a sales agent of the above business, who is in charge of the above model house guidance in the above model house, and the victim F (V, 24 years old) is an employee of the above E, who is in charge of accounting in the above model house.

1. Compulsory indecent acts;

A. In October 2015, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force against the victim by taking the victim’s arms by hand, taking the victim’s hair, taking the victim’s hair, and putting the arms in aground on the shoulder of the victim’s shoulder, with a view to taking the victim’s arms, following the Defendant’s 12:10 serving as a police officer at around 12:0,00, and then committing an indecent act on the victim’s shoulder.

B. In December 2015, the Defendant: (a) 15:00 to 16:00 to 16:00, the Defendant committed an indecent act by force against the next victim on a single-time basis, leading the part of the victim F, who attempted to get out of the above sales model, leading the Defendant to take out of the sales model.

2. The Defendant: (a) was intending to keep the victim D, who was seated in the front of November, 2015, headed in a brush brush brush, and tried to keep the victim D, who was faced with the brush in a brush brush, and then avoided the brush brush.

In other words, “the victim was assaulted in one time by taking the head part of the victim’s head into account”.

3. Around December 19, 2015, the Defendant insultd the victim publicly by saying “G” restaurant located behind the above parcelling-out model, 19:00, and the victim F during the agency employees and the briefing session, “I would like to know why I would have become the victim.”

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment No. 1-A.]

1. Each legal statement of witness D and H;

1. Statement made to I by the police [the fact of subparagraph 1-B of the ruling];

1. Legal statement of the witness F [the facts set forth in the Judgment No. 2]

1. Legal statement of the witness D (the facts set forth in the judgment No. 3);

1. The defendant's statement in court;

arrow