1. For the plaintiffs:

A. Defendant G indicated in attached Form 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1 among the 3,207 square meters of the Gangnam-gu Seoul P paddy field.

1. Determination as to the claim against Defendant C, D, L, M, and N

A. The Plaintiffs to be indicated in the claim are co-owners (each of 1/2 shares) of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Palle 3,207 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

However, Defendant C and D without permission owned a plastic house and a prefabricated position panel building on the ground of part 1’s g., which is part of the instant land, on the ground of part 96 square meters in part 96 square meters in the same paragraph. Defendant L, M, and N occupy the said part 3 square meters, and Defendant L, M, and N occupy the said part 96 square meters, without permission, as part of the instant land.

(4) On the ground of part 20 square meters in part, the owner of a vinyl house and a prefabricated sand position panel building on the ground of the same paragraph, which is located in the same paragraph, occupies the above part 4 square meters in possession of 20 square meters.

Therefore, the Plaintiffs, against Defendant C and D, filed a claim against Defendant C and D for the removal of the said part of the said part of said part of said part of said part of said part of said part of said part of said part of said part of said part of said part of said part of said part of said said part of said part of said part of said part of said said part of said part of said part of said part of said part of said part of said part of said part of said said part of said part of said part of said said part of said part of said part of said

(b) Defendant C, or D: Article 208(3)3(3)(2) of the Civil Procedure Act (amended by public notice) of the Civil Procedure Act; Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act (amended by public notice);

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant E, F, G, H, I, J, andO

A. Determination 1 on the cause of the claim 1) The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or are recognized by Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including additional numbers), the result of the on-site verification by this court, based on the appraiser Q’s appraisal results and the overall purport of pleadings. The plaintiff A and R are siblings. They purchased the land of this case upon S’s recommendation and acquired the ownership of the land of this case by completing the registration of ownership transfer on August 21, 1986 with respect to each/2 shares on August 21, 1986.

After the death of R, Plaintiff B shall independently own the said 1/2 shares of R due to the division of consultation held on June 1, 2010.