logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2015.03.18 2014나4651
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the instant case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following (a) and (b). Therefore, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In addition, the following points shall be added to the part below the part of Section 8 of the judgment of the first instance which is to be added:

(7) On the same day as the date of the instant sales contract, J concluded a sales contract between the Plaintiff and G with respect to the land of this case owned by itself and the Defendants, and the remainder of the contract with the Plaintiff and G was the same as the sales contract of this case. 6) The J demanded the buyer to pay the remainder of the contract and expressed the intent of the validity of the sales contract in the capacity of the Defendants as the Defendants and the parties to the instant 1 and 2 land. 6) As the response thereto, G sent the seller a written statement to the same purport as the instant 2. 7) The suspicion of forgery of private documents and the use of the said investigation documents (i.e., “the Plaintiff et al., the Plaintiff et al., without delegation from the Plaintiff, but the Plaintiff et al., requested the Plaintiff et al. to pay the remainder of the contract within the period of 20 years. 2)

B. The Plaintiff’s assertion that additional determination is made is based on Article 6 of the sales contract of this case.

arrow