Defendant

B Imprisonment for eight months and for six months, each of the defendants A shall be punished by imprisonment.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant A.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A-Co-principals with Defendant A-Work Loaner D and one-time named E in name [criminal records] Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for five months for fraud at the Daegu District Court on November 25, 2010 and two years for suspended execution, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on December 3, 2010.

【Criminal Facts】

D around April 2007, it purchased an USB containing document forgery program through the Internet, posted an advertisement such as “Work Document Transaction I”, “I will do business on the Internet from around that time,” and then, received personal information related to the loan from the person requesting the loan from the person requesting the loan, and forged a certificate of employment, payment statement, etc. based on the personal information related to the loan, and then delivers it to the loan requester, and if the loan is made, I want to obtain the loan from the loan requester by collusion with the financial institution by means of receiving a certain rate from the loan as a fee.

In addition, the defendant reported the Internet advertisements posted D and received a loan by forging the documents, etc. through D.

On July 2007, the Defendant reported the above advertisement to D on July 1, 2007, and contacted with D on July 1, 2007. The Defendant was under the mutual influoral ground near Daegu Ho-dong Wood-dong, Daegu

D has been met in the room.

D For so-called so-called “work loan”, D had the Defendant subscribed to a “credit bank” through the Internet, obtained credit rating, resident registration, etc., and directed the Defendant to enter into a “credit bank” through the Internet. At around that time, the Defendant re-entered D from a mutually unstable multilateral bank located in Daegu-Fagu.

D forged a certificate of employment under the name of the defendant in the F Representative G using a computer at an unsound place.

D In addition, around August 2007, he had connected the defendant with a name-free "E office chief", who is a working loaner residing in the Council.

After that, the head of the above E office around August 27, 2007 is the defendant at the “I real estate” office located in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H.