The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The net B (C life, hereinafter “the Deceased”) is a person who has worked in D mine from March 1978 to October 1981, and in E mining stations from October 198 to October 1990.

As a result of the precise diagnosis of pneumoconiosis on June 27, 1996, the Deceased was approved by the Defendant as an occupational accident as a result of the precise diagnosis of pneumoconiosis type 1 type (1/0), the light disability in the cardiopulmonary function (F1/2), and the pneumoconiosis from the Defendant.

(A) The cause of death (A) directly caused by the death of a private person, (b) the cause of the death of (c) caused by the death of (b) the death of a private person.

B. On May 12, 2016, the Deceased died of a parosis due to the pulmonary dye at F Hospital.

The reason for the death of the deceased stated in the death certificate shall be as follows:

(c)

The Plaintiff, a spouse of the deceased, claimed the payment of bereaved family benefits and funeral expenses to the Defendant.

However, on August 3, 2018, the Defendant died of the deceased’s pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary pulmonary Elimination

The decision is judged.

According to the opinion of the G Research Institute called “the deceased’s death was not recognized due to an occupational disease, and thus, the bereaved family’s benefits and the head of the funeral’s non-land-based decision (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

(d)

The plaintiff filed a request for examination against the defendant, but the defendant dismissed the plaintiff's request on January 23, 2019.

On August 13, 2019, the Plaintiff filed a request for reexamination with the Review Committee for Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance, but the said Committee dismissed the Plaintiff’s request for reexamination.

[Ground for recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion has an impact on the outbreak or aggravation of the pulmonary function due to the pneumoconiosis symptoms, the type of destruction of the merged witness, and the chronic pulmonary disease.