A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 12:01 on September 18, 2016, the Defendant was asked of questions about the circumstances of the instant case from a police officer affiliated with Yangyang Police Station C District D who was called up after receiving a report of 112, “Is any Issssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss.

In the end, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning criminal investigation and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. A written statement;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report and internal investigation report;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6-1-1-4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6-6 months to 1-4 months) (a special person) (a decision of sentence] (a decision of sentence] Defendant did not have any past record of having been sentenced to imprisonment without prison labor or heavier punishment and deposited some money for police officers