The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and the purport of the appeal are the judgment of the first instance.

1. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was around 12:00 on November 7, 2018, the Plaintiff suffered bodily injury, etc. in the upper part of the third part of the third part of the satisfaction of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the judgment.

Since the Defendant neglected to manage a bath and thereby sustained injury by the Plaintiff, the Defendant is obligated to compensate the Plaintiff for damages (i.e., medical expenses of KRW 5,894,200,000 for lost income of KRW 5,000 for lost income of KRW 5,894,200 for the loss of KRW 5,00 for the loss of KRW 5,00 for the loss of KRW 5,00 for the loss of KRW 0

2. According to the evidence evidence evidence evidence Nos. 1 through 7, the Defendant may be found to have operated the instant bath around November 7, 2018, as follows: (a) the Plaintiff received the instant bath from the F Hospital located in the Dong-gu, Busan; (b) the Plaintiff received the breath of the upper part of the 3rd part of the lower part of the 3rd part of the legine part of the lower part of the third part; (c) non-controlledly, fluorous and pin-designated alcoholic beverages on November 16, 2018; and (d) December 21, 2018, respectively.

However, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the Plaintiff was killed in the instant bath on November 12, 2018 and sustained the said injury. There is no other evidence to prove otherwise. At the time, there was a defect in the installation and preservation of the instant bath floor because there was a special slicking material slicking on the instant bath floor, or as the floor of the instant bath is slick to the extent ordinarily anticipated.

there is no evidence to determine the person.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.