The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. On July 13, 2015, among the works to dismantle a building located B in Chungcheong City, there is no obligation to pay medical care expenses, compensation for suspension of business, compensation for disability, etc. to the Defendant on the ground that there is no causal relation between the injured person’s death and the injured person’s injury and the subsequent occurrence of disability (hereinafter “accident”).

B. The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (2 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant asserts that the Defendant did not suffer from the 3th head of the instant accident due to the instant accident, but that the Defendant’s subsequent disability on the part of the Defendant’s injury was not related to the her injury. Therefore, the Defendant asserts that there was no causal relation between the instant accident and the accident.

In fact, the damaged person was diagnosed;

D Hospital’s diagnosis report on July 15, 2015, the first diagnosis report on July 15, 2015, was conducted on the part of the main body part of the 3rd part of the 3rd part of the 3rd part, and was conducted on July 30, 2015 by the first diagnosis report on July 30, 2015 of the 3rd part of the 3rd part of the 3rd part, and was conducted on July 14, 2015 by the victim’s work at another workplace on July 21, 2015.

However, in full view of the following circumstances admitted by the evidence duly admitted in the lower court and the trial court, the victim suffered from the injury of the aggregate of the three parts of the instant accident, and the injury of the part in question caused by the injury to the part in question. Thus, this part of the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

① On July 13, 2015, immediately after the instant accident, the victim received medical treatment in the hospital emergency room. According to the medical record at the time, the victim complained of the victim's pains on the left-hand side of the three sides of the upper-hand side, and the doctor in charge determined that the video was damaged to the front side of the three sides of the upper-hand side of the upper-hand side by simple radiation (X-ray) shooting, and fixed the side trees to the lower-class hand.

. The above.