A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is the actual operator of (ju), E (State) and (State) F in Busan, and G is a person who conducts business management consulting, vicarious performance of various applications for national subsidies, etc. under the trade name of 602 "I" in Busan, Dong-gu H building 602, and J is a person employed by G and assist in I’s work.

In order to promote the employment of the aged who are difficult to find employment or change their occupation, the Republic of Korea grants a certain amount of subsidy, i.e., subsidies for extension of employment of the aged, in proportion to the number of the aged who continue to work according to the abolition or extension of the retirement age.

In addition to the above G, the Defendant abused the fact that a public official in charge of granting subsidies for extension of employment of the aged submits the documents, such as the rules of employment, to verify the abolition and extension of the retirement age on the basis of the documents submitted by the public official upon receipt of evidentiary data on the requirements for payment of subsidies for extension of employment of the aged, and received the above subsidies by submitting the rules of employment by extending the retirement age or by falsely preparing and submitting the rules of employment as if he abolished

Accordingly, G shall establish the rules of employment of the above three companies as of November 1, 2006 stipulating that the retirement age was extended from 55 to 60 years of age on November 1, 2009, when the (ju), E (ju), and (ju) F did not extend the retirement age from 55 to 60 years of age on November 1, 2009, while the retirement age was extended from 60 years of age on November 1, 2009, when the retirement age was extended from 55 to 60 years of age on November 1, 2006, when the retirement age was extended from 55 to 55 years of age. The above three companies' rules of employment as of November 1, 2009 stipulating that the above three companies' retirement age was set falsely, and the defendant affixed the representative of workers and the representative of employers and affixed seals to the above employees on November 1, 200, G shall establish the above rules of employment as of November 1, 2005.