1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Any person who intends to engage in development activities, such as changing the form and quality of land in violation of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without obtaining permission from the competent authority on September 2010, conducted development activities by changing the form and quality by using ready-mixed vehicles with the aim of using it as a parking lot attached to the Cwale, in the end of Seosan City, and using it as a parking lot attached to the Cwale.

2. No building owner who violates the Building Act may use or allow another person to use the building unless the building owner obtains approval for use from the permitting authority; and

Nevertheless, on September 28, 2014, the Defendant used the 5th and the 6th floor of the extension of the rice market as a wedding hall, which was approved by the competent permitting authority, at the Dawa-si and one parcel, D and 1, respectively, without obtaining approval for use from the rice market.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each entry of E and F;

1. Each accusation book, location map, photographic site, official book, etc., status of a violated building, control site photograph, application for permission for extension, written application for permission for construction permit (extension), application for approval for use, written application for approval for use, written application for announcement of approval for use of a building, or application of video-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 140 subparagraph 1 of Article 140 and Article 56 (1) of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act (Unauthorized Development Acts, Selection of Fines) concerning facts constituting an offense (Article 110 subparagraph 2 of the Building Act and Article 22 (3) of the Building Act);

1. The former part of Article 37, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 (within the scope of added-up of amounts) of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant reflects the crime, there is no criminal record of the same kind and no criminal record of the suspended execution, and permission for development activities or approval for use after each of the crimes in this case.