Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 1,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

On August 15, 2013, at around 09:15, Defendants discovered victim F, who passed around the place of Ma, operated by Defendant A in Seo-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City.

Defendant

A previously tried to follow the fact that Defendant B told Defendant B to learn Kaom technology before the victim F.

Defendant

A reported that the victim F, who had escaped, she saw him her as a brick to the two descendants, and followed by the breath of the victim F by putting him over the floor, and then go beyond the floor of the victim G, who was the wife of the victim F.

Defendant

B By doing so, the victim F's breath was dried up to the floor by cutting down the breath, and then dump was dumped by double hand, and dumped up the victim G who dumped up to the floor.

As a result, the Defendants jointly committed approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the victim F and the knee knee kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne g, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ partial statement

1. Each legal statement of F and G;

1. Photographs of each case site (investigative records, 62-75 pages);

1. Each injury diagnosis letter (G, F);

1. Application of CCTV video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes to the site;

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (elective Selection of Fines);

1. Statutory mitigation: Articles 21(2) and 55(1)6 of the Criminal Act (as to the crime of excessive defense and the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. against Victims F)

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Determination as to the Defendants’ assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the Defendants asserted that the above Defendants’ act constitutes self-defense and that it does not constitute a crime.

(b).