logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.09.01 2014노1352
상해
Text

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that Defendant A is the Dong representative of E apartment 210 and Defendant B was the Dong representative of the same apartment 208 Dong unit, and it is not good for Defendant B to make mutual appraisal due to the complaints related to the dispute of the council of occupants' representatives regarding the said apartment. A.

Defendant

A around 15:00 on May 12, 2013, around 15:00, the Defendant, “A”, “I think I think I would like to think I would like to see I would like to see I would like to see I would like to see if I would like to see I would like to see I would like to see I would like to see I would like to see I would like to see I would like to do so.”

During that period, the defendant injured the victim by hand, such as getting the victim to sleep down and pushed down the victim's threshold, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of treatment, such as salt, tension, etc.

B. As above, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the left-free salt, tension, etc., for about two weeks of medical treatment, by shouldering the victim’s left-hand hand, while punishing the victim A(49 years of age) and Si expenses.

2. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant A1) In the course of misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles as to Defendant A’s strict fingers, Defendant A’s strict fingers were broken by Defendant A’s strict fingers, and there was no fact that Defendant B was pushed down, and did not go beyond or go beyond the threshold of Defendant B, such as written in the facts charged. 2) The lower court’s sentence of unfair sentencing (one million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

B. Defendant B was unilaterally assaulted by Defendant A at the time of the instant case, and there was no misunderstanding of Defendant B’s fingers as indicated in the facts charged.

Doctrine, even if any, had fingered

Even if the defendant A intentionally added his fingers to the drafting of the defendant B and unilaterally abused his fingers, and the defendant A's fingers occurred inevitably due to pulmonal difficulty, etc. in the process.

arrow