1. The Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

2. However, the above punishment shall be executed against the Defendants for five years.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a university student in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (special quasi-rape) by the Defendants. Defendant B is a company student from the time of high school to the close.

Defendant

A around 00:00 on December 28, 2013, around 00:0, with F, the motive for the university, the victim G (the family name, the 23 years of age). At the contact with Defendant B, Defendant F and the victim were met with Defendant B, but at the “J” main point of “J” located in the area of the I University located in Mapo-gu Seoul, Seoul, up to 3:0:0, four times a week from the 1st place of “J” located in the area of the I University located in Mapo-gu, Seoul, to the 3rd of the new wall, she dice two times a week from the main point of “K” located in the area of the two-lane, to the 7th of A.m.

The Defendants, at that time, were able to have sexual intercourse with the victim who got home with F alone and cannot properly get off by drinking, resulting in the victim who failed to get off his body.

Accordingly, at around 08:00 on the same day, Defendant A moved the victim to 202 Mael in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, and Defendant B got contact with Defendant A and entered Defendant B 202.

In addition, at the above 202 room around that time, Defendant A, who had been in the state of her panty and panty in the state of her ability to resist by drinking alcohol, had sexual intercourse once with the victim, and Defendant B, who was waiting in the toilet for the above 202 room, had no part of the victim in order to have sexual intercourse once with the victim who was in the state of her non-operability as above, but her beliefed to have sexual intercourse with the wind that does not have a sexual intercourse with the victim’s horses after hearing the victim’s horses and having no sexual intercourse.

Accordingly, the Defendants, together, have sexual intercourse with the victim who is in a state of impossibility to resist.

2. Defendant A’s quasi-rape on December 28, 2013: (a) around 10:52, 2013, the victim was in the state of failing to resist by drinking alcohol between around 10:19 and around 14:19 of the same day.