A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. [2015 high group 1850] The Defendant was the representative director of the company E, and the above E, from R on January 2, 2012, the Plaintiff agreed with R to the rate of delay in construction work with R as “15/1,00 (day)” and drafted a standard construction contract for construction work with the same content as that of construction work in Gwangju, Seo-gu, the ownership of R, the 10th floor above, the construction cost of the construction cost of the construction of the construction of the building with the 10th floor above the ground, the construction period of the construction cost of the construction of the 2.79 billion won, and the construction period from January 16, 2012 to July 15, 2012.

Although the defendant continued the above construction, the above construction was completed on January 20, 2013 after the date of the above construction agreement, and was approved on February 19, 2013.

On March 2013, R filed a lawsuit, such as requesting a delay of 218 days from the day following the date of the construction work to the date of approval for the use of the above contract with the Plaintiff as the Plaintiff, Defendant E Co., Ltd. Around March 2013, R filed a lawsuit with the Gwangju District Court, and the requested compensation was about 3/1,000 (day) whose rate of delay is less than 15/1,000 (day) and whose rate of delay is less than 1,360,000 won.

When the defendant received a claim for delayed payment of a large amount of prize as above, he had the intention to reduce the rate of delayed prize and submit it as evidence by altering the rate of delayed prize specified in the standard contract for private construction works.

A. On June 2013, the Defendant altered private documents: “15/1,000 (day)” as indicated in the column for the delayed payment of standard contract for private construction works at a non-permanent place; “1.5/1,000 (day)”; and copied the said contract in one copy.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising the right, the Defendant modified the standard contract for private construction works in S.

B. On June 14, 2013, the Defendant at the alteration company’s presentation of a written response to the said lawsuit at the public service center of the Gwangju District Court located in 7-12, Dong-gu, Gwangju, and altered as described in paragraph 1.