logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.11.20 2014고단2705
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동공갈)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On January 20, 2014, the Ulsan District Court sentenced two years of suspended sentence to a violation of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry at the Ulsan District Court, which became final and conclusive on July 1, 2014.

On March 2013, the Defendants decided to attract money and valuables from a massage clinic operated in Ulsan, Gyeongnam, etc. to report to an investigation agency on commercial sex acts as if they were reported to the investigation agency, and subsequently, decided to seek money and valuables from Defendant B to use for intimidation. Defendant A had to prepare accounts for receiving remittance of the amount of revolving money and shared their roles.

Since then, Defendant B received h a G person’s spophone at a sports massage place business where it is difficult to identify the trade name in Ulsan Jung-gu’s Ban-dong around that time.

Defendant

A around April 16, 2013, at the agricultural Dongp branch located in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Busan-do, A opened a passbook (Account Number I) in its name.

1. On March 3, 2014, at around 23:55, the Defendants: (a) called 4,000,000 clickphones to the above clickphones around L operated by the victim in Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si; and (b) called “4,00,000 clickphones were lost” to the victim; (c) the victim was threatened by the police, stating that “The money shall be transferred to the City bank account; (d) the account number shall be M; (e) the victim shall report to the police; and (d) the victim threatened the victim by telephone with the same content; (e) the victim had expressed the attitude that the victim would not pay the money; and (e) the police reported as if the clicks were sexual traffic business establishments; and (e) the police called “the remittance of money” by phoneing the victim to the said clicks.

As a result, the Defendants jointly tried to take money from the frighten victim who was frighten of the above intimidation, but did not make the victim not pay the money.

arrow