1. All of the plaintiffs' claims against the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The network E, the Defendant, and F’s G Joint Operation 1) network E (H students, hereinafter “the network”).

on May 1, 1995, G (the trade name before modification: K; hereinafter referred to as “G”) between the Defendant and F on May 1, 1995 under the name of Dong-gu, Incheon.

According to the evidence No. 2, as to G’s business share ratio, the deceased, F, and the Defendant’s business share ratio were set at 33.3% from May 1, 1995 to December 30, 2006. However, the witness F set the deceased, F, and the Defendant’s business share ratio at 33.3% from the first time to 33.3% from the deceased, F, and the Defendant’s business share ratio was set at 40%, respectively, and the changed share ratio was maintained until the Defendant left G. The Plaintiffs testified to the effect that the Defendant’s business share ratio was 20% from the deceased’s business share ratio to 30% from the 20th of the first time to 30% from the 20th of the first time to the 20th of the 20th of the 20th of the 20th of the 3th of the 20th of the 20th of the 20th of the 20th of the 3th of the 36th of the 20th of the Ga.

The plaintiffs asserted that the defendant's withdrawal period from G is December 30, 2006 according to Gap evidence No. 2, and that the defendant is not a party to this, and they are determined based on this.

G withdrawn from the operation of G. Since December 31, 2006, the deceased and F operated G at each of 40% and 60% from December 31, 2006, and on February 28, 2007, the deceased secedes from G and the F voluntarily withdraws from the operation of G, from March 1, 2007 to July 31, 2013.