Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant damaged property: (a) around June 12, 2014, the apartment house E-household 105 101, 105 dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, and (b) the victim F from October 201 to October 201, while exercising the right of retention on the above apartment; and (c) the Defendant could not reside in the said apartment because he/she was the owner; (d) the victim was removed, respectively, a lien marking banner installed on the wall on the front side of the said apartment; and (e) a lien notice and locks installed on the same apartment door.

Accordingly, the defendant has concealed or damaged the property of the victim who is the sum of the market value, thereby impairing its utility.

2. In the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (1), the Defendant: (a) removed the locks installed by the victim in the entrance door and installed a new lock; (b) putting the said apartment into the said apartment house and cut off the house with the victim, such as computers, printers, and bedclothess, and resided therein.

Accordingly, the defendant invadeds on the residence of the victim, and took the object of the victim's possession or right, and interfered with the exercise of the right by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of witness F in the third protocol of the trial;

1. A copy of a guide, a duplicate of written judgment (related to the fact of claims), and a duplicate of written judgment (related to the right of retention);

1. Comprehensively taking account of the copies of photographs related to the exercise of the right of retention and the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court at the site photograph related to the exercise of the right of retention, the victim, who was likely to intrude into the instant 101 by using the key by using the key from the employees without the consent of the victim, was installed to replace the locks, and even if the victim occupied the right of retention by attaching the banner and the lien notice on the bend and the front door while exercising the right of retention, the victim’s demand that the victim be the horse of the three-month maturity.