logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2015.05.14 2015고정285
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동재물손괴등)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the actual manager of C Co., Ltd. mainly carrying out internal interior interior decoration work, and Defendant B is the employee of the above company, and Defendant B was the director of the site, and even if the interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior interior construction work was completed from 207 of the F building owned by the victim E in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seowon, the Defendants conspired with the Defendants on the ground that the victim did not pay the cost of KRW 250 million, and caused damage to the property by installing locks and impairing its utility as follows.

① At around 19:00 on September 22, 2014, at the entrance, two banners, “in possession of the right” were installed on the right side, and the hacks and locks were locked at the steel store.

② From around 19:00 on September 26, 2014 to around 20:00, as soon as possible in the left and right flusium, “in possession of the right of retention” has been written as “in possession of the right of retention.”

③ On October 2, 2014, at around 19:00, the words “in possession of the right of retention” were written in the original column of the wall, which was newly installed as the interior fishing of the wall, as soon as possible, and the entrance door of the entrance was locked with strings and locks, and the entrance door, door door, and door door door, “in possession of the right of retention.............................................”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Application of each statute of examination of evidence;

1. Defendants: Articles 366 and 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow