A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person engaging in driving a C-A-car.

On September 24, 2015, at around 17:15, the Defendant driven the said car while under the influence of alcohol on the blood alcohol concentration, and driven the said car on the street near the Geumsan Ginseng at the port of Pakistan, the Defendant driven the said car along a one-lane road from the direction of the water blade to the gold-line distance.

Since there is a place where the center line of yellow solid lines has been installed, there was a duty of care to reduce the speed to those engaged in driving service and enter the lane and to make a safe internship in the U.S. region.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was driven by the victim D (year 54) who was in the atmosphere of the signal at the opposite lane while the Defendant intending to enter the median line immediately, and was driven by the victim D (year 54). The front part of the front part of the Ecoo bus.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such negligence, the above victim was in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, salvinal sale, etc., and the victim F (the 13 years of age) who is a bus passenger, with approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence to take a drinking level) at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) of this Article, there are reasonable grounds to deem that a police officer who was called upon receiving a report of 112 was driven under the influence of alcohol, such as where he finds the Defendant at the time of discovery of the Defendant, by scambling red face, inaculing, inaculing, inaculing, and saving the state of drinking by a drunk, etc., and accordingly, he refused to take a drinking level by failing to comply with the demand of the H to take a drinking level at the place of the said accident three times from 17:36 to 17:56 on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Fact-finding report, internal investigation report and investigation report (Evidence 9);

1.Each.