1. The Defendant’s decision on March 11, 2015 pertaining to the requirements of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State (hereinafter “persons who rendered distinguished services to the State”) was rendered against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 21, 2013, the Plaintiff entered the Marine Corps into the Marine Corps and was discharged from active service on October 20, 2014.

B. On October 22, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground that “Around February 2014, the Defendant applied for registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground that “A person who had knee-knee-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne-kne

C. On March 11, 2015, according to the deliberation and resolution of the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement, the Defendant rendered a disposition against the Plaintiff on March 11, 2015 on the ground that “It is difficult to recognize the Plaintiff as having suffered from a acute wound in the performance of duties or during education and training directly related to the national defense security, etc. as a chronic disease, and is recognized as having been incurred from daily performance of duties, and there is no proximate causal relation with the performance of duties or education and training, and the right kne kne sne sne sne sne sne sne se se se se se se se se se se se se

(hereinafter “instant disposition”) D.

On April 18, 2015, the Plaintiff appealed and filed an objection against the Defendant on April 18, 2015, and the Defendant changed the recognition of the instant disposition to the lower court on July 13, 2015, on the ground that “The Plaintiff had a causal link with ordinary duties, such as the performance of duties, not directly related to the national security of national security, etc., both of the sloping part and the right-hand slot part of the slot part, both of which are the sloping part on the left side and the right-hand slot part,” on the ground that “The instant disposition has a causal relationship with the Plaintiff.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and Eul evidence 7 to 12 (each number is included; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The defendant.