beta
Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 10,000,000 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from February 18, 2016 to August 12, 2016.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The plaintiff and C are legally married couple who completed the marriage report on February 17, 2000, and have two children under the chain.
B. C From September 2014 to November of the same year, the Defendant was receiving treatment at a hospital where the Defendant works as a nurse and became aware of the Defendant’s knowledge in the school Chang-si.
C. Since December 2014, C and the Defendant began to exchange text messages or letters with the intent to love from time to time, and to teach them by providing meals.
The plaintiff, who became aware of the relationship between C and the defendant, has set up a claim against the defendant, and the defendant also agreed that the plaintiff had an inappropriate relationship with C and that the plaintiff should not communicate or meet again. However, even until June 2016 during the lawsuit of this case, text messages to C are sent to C.
E. On the other hand, around June 15, 2015, the Plaintiff posted a notice stating that “C and the Defendant engaged in an act of unfolding at the motherel and the Defendant’s residence” along with a credit card transaction statement on the apartment bulletin board in which the Defendant’s working hospital and the Defendant reside. On July 18, 2015, around July 18, 2015, the Plaintiff abused the Defendant’s residence and stolen the letter sent by C to the Defendant.
(2) The defendant filed a complaint against the plaintiff on the above facts constituting the crime, and the plaintiff was subject to a disposition of suspension of indictment against his/her residence and theft suspicion, and a disposition of non-right to prosecute against his/her defamation). [Grounds for recognition] The defendant did not dispute part of the facts, Gap's statements in subparagraphs 1 through 6, 8, 9, 11, and Eul's evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings.
2. Determination
A. Mental pain is inflicted on a spouse by infringing on a couple’s communal life falling under the essence of marriage or interfering with the maintenance thereof, and infringing on a spouse’s right as a spouse, by committing an unlawful act with the spouse of the third party.