logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.06.13 2018나72970
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff is a legally married couple who completed the marriage report on May 4, 1994, and the defendant is a relationship between C and the middle school.

B. Around April 2015, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Plaintiff was able to teach C with the Ma on the Maurel on December 8, 2016, and was able to doubt the relationship.

C. Accordingly, the Defendant borrowed a letter from the Plaintiff, and then called “B (Defendant)” to the Plaintiff on that page, and only from May 16, 100, and we will not communicate or talk again with the Plaintiff. On or after December 8, 190, the Defendant prepared a letter of confirmation (Evidence A 2) and a letter of confirmation (Evidence A 2) stating that “I will not raise any problem after this hour, and will not enforce or approach it. I will compensate the Plaintiff for three times as agreed upon. A (Plaintiff) will pay KRW 30 million upon divorce.” In addition, I prepared each letter of payment (Evidence A and each of the above documents collectively referred to as “each of the instant documents”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including a provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Gap evidence Nos. 2 and 3 are set up by the plaintiff's coercion, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion continues to engage in the Plaintiff’s act with C, the wife, from April 2014 to December 2016, and thus, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff KRW 30 million as compensation for consolation money and its delay damages.

B. The Defendant asserted that he was not in a relationship with C, and that he did not have any act of bad faith, even if he did not have any act of bad faith.

Even if one year has elapsed since then, the filing of the instant lawsuit is nothing more than the purpose of accepting the agreed amount.

arrow