logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.07.06 2017고단2962
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 20, 2017, the Defendant was in violation of the vehicle signal around 01:30 on February 20, 2017, driving C cab and operating the E-Tart near the Southern-gu Incheon Metropolitan City E-Tart, and was controlled by Incheon Southern Police Station F.

The defendant, who was seated in a driver's seat and resisted against the crackdown, was the police officer in charge of the crackdown.

“Along with the knowledge that F is standing on the front door of the driver’s seat, F is shocked by opening the door so that it can not be opened, and the operation of the patrol car was obstructed by “abbundance” as expected to be in the between the patrol car and the between the patrol car.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on traffic control.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of the statutes concerning the contents of witness G statements;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. When the defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, receives a notice of traffic penalty from the injured party due to the violation of signal, the defendant is dissatisfied with the crime of this case, and the crime of this case is committed under the suspension period, the fact that the crime of this case is less likely to be committed during the suspension period, the fact that the damage was not recovered or agreed, the fact that the form of force used is less severe, the fact that there was no record of punishment for the same crime, the fact that the above suspension of execution was punished due to negligence, etc. shall be considered as favorable circumstances, and the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc.

arrow