logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.05.27 2016고단2312
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 29, 2016, around 10:53, the Defendant: (a) driven the D Kawn vehicle in front of the “C Hospital” located in the Southern-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and carried out a green light in violation of traffic signals; (b) Police Officer F and Assistant G, who is the police patrol officer belonging to the Incheon Southern Police Station Epicing Police Station, patrol the vehicle, and controlled traffic, sent the Defendant’s witness to the above traffic signal violation and immediately stop the Defendant on the patrol lane.

However, the Defendant driven the above car engine at the underground parking lot of the 508 "KT Incheon branch", Nam-gu, Incheon, and the above F and the above G notified the Defendant of the violation of the Road Traffic Act, and issued a penalty notice, depending on the Defendant of the patrol lane, at the above underground parking lot.

In the above underground parking lot, Defendant 1 accepted the Defendant’s demand and did not support the Defendant’s demand, and “I are now cut.”

Don't bl't bl't bl't.

"A, D. C. C. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S. S.

(i)Embling, magrh, h.,” and the foregoing penalty notice was issued to the above G, who had been seated at the chief patrol officer;

The Defendant continued to identify “pesters”.

In addition, it is not a road, but a single band-band-band-band-band-pon

I. I see my mind.

h. Mad, Chewing fluor, fluor, fluor, of a bitch fluor;

C, as soon as breath, breath is so cut.

"..........." The F and the above G made it impossible to operate the patrol vehicle by blocking the patrol vehicle in front of the said patrol vehicle for about 25 minutes in order to prevent the said G from leaving the place.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on traffic control.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136(1) of the option of punishment (a) of the Criminal Act;

arrow