A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On May 31, 2013, the Defendant sent a phone call to the victim G at a closed place to the victim G on May 31, 2013, and “The lending of KRW 2 million as expenses are needed to run apartment business,” and around the end of July 2013, the Defendant shows a new construction plan to the victim G who conducts eco-friendly construction materials business that was known by the introduction of the branch at the office of the Defendant located in the Sejong Special Self-Governing City H around the end of July 2013, the Defendant displayed a plan for the construction of the three-party J apartment at the Sejong City, and the three-party retired public officials are working at our company and the design office, and they are linked with the public officials of the Sejong City.

J Permission related to apartment business is an internal consultation with the relevant public officials known to him/her, and thus, it will immediately decrease the permission.

In order to do so, funds to contact related departments, such as branch or public official, are needed.

bank lending 50 million won by borrowing 50 million won or more; and

8. By the end of 31.31, a false statement was made to the effect that “To assist repayment with KRW 130 million and to supply eco-friendly construction materials.”

However, in the case of Sejong-si J apartment at that time, without a new construction plan, only remains at the review stage, and there was no need to contact with the public officials of the relevant ministries or there was no possibility of lending the PF loan. (State), since the Republic of Korea has been liable for the debts worth KRW 80 million, including KRW 10 million from the second financial rights and KRW 20,000,000,000 from the others who are difficult to operate without any profit from the project, even if it was borrowed money from the damaged party, it was thought that it was used for office operating expenses, expenses of other projects, personal purposes, etc., and did not have any intent or ability to repay the borrowed money to the victim.

Nevertheless, on May 31, 2013, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and caused the damage to it, 2 million won with a new bank account under the name of the defendant on May 31, 2013, and 37 million won with an account under the name of the defendant on August 7, 2013.