1. The bankruptcy claim of the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff A against the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff is confirmed to be KRW 31,821,085.

2...

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. A is the representative of “D”, and the Defendant is the head of “D”, and the Defendant is a household construction among the construction works of the F apartment in the Sejong-si, Sejong-si, the G District H apartment construction works among the construction works of the apartment in the Sejong-si, the head household construction works among the construction works of the apartment in the Sejong-si, and the head household construction works among the construction works of the I apartment in the Sejong-si, and the J is a person who has been

B. On February 2, 2015, A and the Defendant entered into a contract for construction works with the Defendant as a contractor and the contractor, with the payment of the construction cost of KRW 357,500,000 for the main household construction among the construction works for the construction works for the housing unit among the construction works for the housing unit among the construction works for the housing unit in Sejong-si, Seoul-si, and entered into a contract for construction works with the Defendant with the payment of the construction cost of KRW 70,00,000 (including value-added tax) for the remaining construction works for the housing unit construction among the construction works for the housing unit in Sejong-si, the end of March 2015, with the payment of the construction cost of KRW 44,500,000 (including value-added tax) for the remaining construction works for the housing unit construction (hereinafter referred to as the “YG construction works”). On April 2, 2015.

C. On October 20, 2015, A filed the instant lawsuit against the Defendant claiming for the payment of the unpaid construction cost of Sejong K Blue construction, the unpaid construction cost of KRW 81,384,546, and the unpaid construction cost of KRW 194,830,00, and the additional tax amount for the said amount, damages for delay, etc.

L, the representative director of the Defendant, filed the instant lawsuit and filed a complaint with J on charges of attempted fraud that he/she had attempted to acquire or attempted to acquire KRW 81,384,546 of the fixed-type K block construction cost, but on August 29, 2016, in the Incheon District Public Prosecutor’s Office, he/she partially dismissed the labor cost, on the ground that it seems that it was true, or that it was insufficient to view that J was clearly aware that he/she should additionally receive the construction cost, and that it was obviously false (Evidence of evidence).