1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part regarding the claim for return of unjust enrichment against the president of the Defendant B University is dismissed.

2. Defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is a person who was appointed as a full-time lecturer at B University, a national university on October 1, 2002, and was promoted to professors on March 1, 2015, and is in the English education division at the college of education.

B. On December 6, 2016, the Ministry of Education conducted a comprehensive audit on the two universities, and notified the Plaintiff to take measures for revenue revenue in the relevant accounts by taking a minor disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff on the following grounds, and by recovering three million won of the research cost already paid from the Plaintiff.

- The Plaintiff submitted an application for research tasks in the school of “C” on November 201, 2013: A: there is no research assistant: the research period: from December 1 to November 30, 14, 13: 3,000, and research expenses: 3,000,000 won) and selected as a research task. After compiling a master’s degree thesis “C” of a third party D, which was passed on February 2, 2013, without origin and quotation, by compiling a summary of the results of research tasks in the school of Korea on August 31, 2014 (the first author: D, the first author: A research expenses of KRW 3,00,000 were paid.

- An industry-academic cooperation foundation for B University has approved it without due process upon the plaintiff's request on June 15, 2016 for withdrawal of the results of the above study, which is the audit period.

C. The president of Defendant B University applied for reexamination to the Ministry of Education for the revocation of the above order, and the Ministry of Education dismissed the application for reexamination on April 26, 2017.

On June 7, 2017, the president of the Defendant B University requested the General Disciplinary Committee on the Grounds of Disciplinary Reason No. 1 (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason”). The General Disciplinary Committee on Public Educational Officials at B University decided to reprimand the Plaintiff on July 28, 2017. On August 7, 2017, the president of the Defendant B University violated Article 56 (Duty of Fidelity) of the State Public Officials Act, and the instant disciplinary action violates Article 78 (1) of the same Act and Article 51 (1) of the Public Educational Officials Act, on the ground that the instant disciplinary action constitutes grounds for disciplinary action under Article 56 (1) of the State Public Officials Act.