logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2018.12.20 2018고단633
업무상횡령등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Defendant A's record of the crime committed by Defendant A] On July 24, 2014, the Daegu High Court sentenced Defendant A to five years of suspension of execution for three years of imprisonment due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement) and decided on August 1, 2014.

[2] Defendant A, who was charged with the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embezzlement) on January 25, 2013 in relation to F University doctrine, as the president of F University, a junior college E, from around January 1987 to port, was arrested and thus unable to hold the president’s office any longer. Defendant B, who retired from F University, as the professor, had Defendant B take charge of the president’s duties from January 25, 2013 to November 30, 2014, has been continuously engaged in the operation of F University while making an overall decision on the operation of F University.

Defendant

A In fact, as above, took overall charge of the operation of the F University, Defendant B operated the F University according to the direction of Defendant A, and Defendant C performed the work of executing funds, such as school expenses, with the secretary general of the F University.

Defendant

A had a duty to select a public corporation through fair procedures on behalf of the F University in 2013 and to select a company that shall implement the horse riding course on the land owned by the F University in 2013.

Defendant

A around December 2, 2013, Defendant B and Defendant C directed Defendant B and Defendant C to “to recover part of the cost of the riding track construction.” Defendant B and Defendant C, the representative of Defendant G Co., Ltd. who had performed the riding track construction, will be able to entrust the construction of ordering at F universities even after the refund of part of the cost of the construction.

Defendant D refers to “A” in response thereto, and Defendant D refers to “I” located in the Northern-si, Ma-si, Ma-si, Y around January 7, 2014.

arrow