logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.05.24 2018가단203453
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The Defendants’ real estate corresponding to each Defendant’s real estate indicated in attached Table B, to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Claim against Defendant C, F, G, and H

A. The fact that there is no dispute over the cause of the claim, and the purport of the entire argument in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 is recognized in full view of the purport of the entire argument.

According to the above facts of recognition, the above defendants have the duty to deliver each of the above defendants' real estate in the indication B of the real estate to be delivered to the plaintiff by defendant as stated in the attached Table.

B. The Defendants asserted that they cannot deliver each of the above buildings because they did not receive the lease deposit from the lessor of each building residing by the Defendants, but they cannot oppose the Plaintiff merely because they did not receive the lease deposit as above.

The above defendants' arguments are without merit.

C. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the above defendants is justified, and this is accepted.

2. Claim against Defendant B, D, and E

(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;

(b) Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

arrow